The Case Against ACPO

ACPO—the Association of Chief Police Officers—is reported in today’s Mail to be holding a £500k “champagne gala” whilst 28,000 Police Officers face redundancy. What follows is Part 1 of HMP Britain’s Case Against ACPO. Feel free to add your own.

ACPO is against Liberty

Labour, with ACPO lobbying, passed laws to advance Britain along the road to a police state. ANPR, DNA retention, and the introduction of Tasers are just some of the policies ACPO have helped craft.

ACPO is a self-serving Lobby Group

Many of Labour’s policing laws were effectively written by ACPO and designed to serve the interests of ACPO’s elite against the interests of the taxpayer. The Criminal Justice and Police Act (2001) is a prime example: under this legislation, ACPO staff—and remember ACPO is a private company—became entitled to expensive gold-plated civil service pension.

Their lobbying also extended to powergrabs: the Police and Justice Act (2006) mandates ACPO Ltd must be consulted prior to changes in certain police powers. It also requires a representative from ACPO to be on of the National Police Improvement Agency. The codes regarding PACE may only be modified with ACPO consultation.

Police Reform Act (2002) granted ACPO extraordinary powers: it made ACPO the only private corporation whose employees can hold the office of police constable. Section 96 of the Police Reform Act (2002) grants the President of ACPO the powers of arrest and powers of a Chief Constable.

ACPO has more money than it can spend

ACPO has £15 million in cash at the bank and has an income of approximately £10 million per year. It has various commercial activities: it accredits burglar alarms, sells (and promotes) its own accreditation service for the Community Safety Accreditation Scheme and makes a profit each year in excess of £300,000 by holding an annual conference.

ACPO also has a sizeable property empire but refuses to say how large it is. It is known that a small subdivision of ACPO—the Terrorism & Allied Matters Committee—spends £1.3 million on luxury apartments for its members.

ACPO is highly political

Police officers are forbidden by law from joining a political party and diligently avoid accusations of political bias. The same cannot be said of Chief Police Officers and ACPO.

In an interview on Radio 4′s Today, the President of ACPO, Sir Hugh Orde, threatened to resign if Conservative Plans for elected Chief Constables became law.

In 2007, then-President of ACPO Ken Jones spoke out in support of the Government plans–opposed by the Conservatives–to increase precharge detention beyond 28 days.

This lead to the Conservatives writing in a private election note of ACPO giving “political cover to the Labour Government repeatedly and consistently” and engaging in “gratuitous photocalls” with Gordon Brown and other ministers. It goes on to say it “shows almost no criticism of the current Government”.

ACPO is Secretive Private Company

ACPO president Sir Hugh Orde has acknowledged that its role as a private company was “uncomfortable” an Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary, the police watchdog, has said its ‘status as a private limited company ‘cannot continue’.

Despite receiving much public funding, responsible for senior appointments in quangos and helping the state draft legislation, ACPO is immune to Freedom of Information laws and is not bound by the usual rules of the civil service, despite receiving many of its perks.

If ACPO were to be brought into the state and its civil service, a justifiable question would be what is the difference between the APA, NPIA and ACPO, and do we really need it?

Related posts:

  1. In Defence of Leicestershire Police A defense of Leicestershire Police in the wake of the...
  2. “Police are there as Public Servants” Events of the past week in HMP Britain have underlined...
  3. Lord Carlile’s Report on the Operation of Terrorism Legislation Lord Carlile, Parliament's Independent Review of certain Terrorism Legislation, accuses...
  4. Tory Plans to end Surveillance State (sort of) Dominic Grieve and Eleanor Laing for the Conservatives have published...
  5. Why did Ali Dizaei get away with it for so long? How the Met were hamstrung by the politicians at the...

No Comments

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

ARCHIVES

June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
April 2009

TAGS

trivial prosecution traffic torture Terrorism Act taser sussex police statistics Section 44 ripa retirees Rangzieb Ahmed Protest policing pledge police brutality police assault PNC pilkington nottingham north wales MI5 / MI6 met credit cards met mass surveillance Mass Arrest managementese magistrates kettling ISI IPCC Intercept Modernisation Programme ian tomlinson humour Grampian Police good policing g20 driving dogs dna david davis complaints collusion cleveland CCTV bent cops Ali Dizaei